'Double target' ultrasound monitoring of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to 1) evaluate by power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) the response to therapy of the most inflamed joint and enthesis (target sites) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients starting a biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD); and 2) to investigate the correlation between the US response and clinical data. METHODS: Consecutive PsA patients with US synovitis and US 'active' enthesitis, starting a bDMARD, were included. The joint with the highest OMERACT-EULAR-US composite score and the enthesis with the highest PD grade (targets) were identified at baseline. The US examination and clinical assessment were performed at 0, 3 and 6 months. The response of OMERACT-EULAR-US synovitis composite score was defined as reaching a grade = 0 at follow-up examination; synovial and entheseal PD responses were defined as a PD=0 and/or a reduction of ≥2 PD grades at follow-up examination. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Synovitis composite score, synovial PD and entheseal PD showed significant responses at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline (p<0.01). Synovial PD responses were higher than entheseal PD responses at 3 months (71.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.01) and 6 months (77.8% vs. 46.7%, p=0.02). US synovitis responses were correlated with DAPSA (p<0.01) and MDA responses (p=0.01 for composite score, p=0.02 for PD). CONCLUSIONS: US was found sensitive for monitoring treatment response in PsA patients starting a biologic drug. Entheseal PD was less responsive than synovial PD, suggesting that enthesitis may represent a 'difficult-to-treat' domain in PsA.

Multimodal ultrasound muscle assessment in patients with rheumatic diseases: a patient-based reliability study.

Objectives: The aim was to explore the inter-reliability of a newly developed US scanning protocol (multimodal US) for the assessment of different aspects of sarcopenia-related muscle involvement, including muscle mass, muscle quality and muscle stiffness [using point shear-wave elastography (SWE)], in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Methods: Quadriceps muscle mass (i.e. muscle thickness), muscle quality (i.e. muscle echogenicity evaluated with both a visual semi-quantitative scale and a dedicated software package for image analysis, ImageJ) and point SWE measurements were obtained by two rheumatologists (blinded to each other's evaluation) in consecutive RMD patients without previous/current myositis or neuromuscular disorders.Inter-reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Cohen's kappa (κ) for categorical variables. Results: A total of 45 RMD patients were enrolled [mean age 54.5 (16.0) years, male-to-female ratio 1:1.5, mean BMI 24.6 (4.6) kg/m2], 10 with PsA, 7 RA, 5 AS, 5 PMR, 4 SLE, 4 gout, 4 OA, 3 FM and 3 SSc. The grade of inter-rater reliability was excellent for muscle mass [ICC = 0.969 (0.953 < ICC < 0.979)]. Regarding muscle echogenicity, the agreement was substantial/almost perfect using the visual semi-quantitative scale (weighted linear = 0.793, weighted squared = 0.878) and excellent using ImageJ analysis [ICC = 0.916 (0.876 < ICC < 0.944)]. Finally, a good agreement was obtained for point SWE measurements [ICC = 0.76 (0.712 < ICC < 0.8)]. Conclusion: Multimodal US is a novel and reliable tool for the evaluation of different aspects of muscle involvement (muscle mass, muscle quality and muscle stiffness) in RMD patients.

Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study.

Objectives: To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients. Results: The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.